Comments on: Lauren Conrad’s Hilarious Reading List http://chamberfour.com/2010/01/30/lauren-conrads-hilarious-reading-list/ for readers of books and ebooks Sat, 31 Jul 2010 18:41:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Nico Vreeland http://chamberfour.com/2010/01/30/lauren-conrads-hilarious-reading-list/comment-page-1/#comment-2471 Nico Vreeland Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:58:31 +0000 http://chamberfour.com/?p=6100#comment-2471 Yeah, early literary fame is interesting. Although, I find it more interesting when the literary part of the fame is deserved (like Jonathan Safran-Foer or Zadie Smith). Also, how do you know she didn't have a ghostwriter? I'm hesitant to believe that, even if it's the official line. Yeah, early literary fame is interesting. Although, I find it more interesting when the literary part of the fame is deserved (like Jonathan Safran-Foer or Zadie Smith).

Also, how do you know she didn’t have a ghostwriter? I’m hesitant to believe that, even if it’s the official line.

]]> By: Robert Nagle http://chamberfour.com/2010/01/30/lauren-conrads-hilarious-reading-list/comment-page-1/#comment-2470 Robert Nagle Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:13:18 +0000 http://chamberfour.com/?p=6100#comment-2470 Semi-related: <a href="http://www.imaginaryplanet.net/weblogs/idiotprogrammer/2009/06/embarrassments-of-obscurity-part-23/" rel="nofollow">My post about Lauren Conrad's literary career </a>. To summarize: early fame is a literary curse, not a blessing. But we'll never know if she takes advantage of this golden literary opportunity. Semi-related: My post about Lauren Conrad’s literary career . To summarize: early fame is a literary curse, not a blessing. But we’ll never know if she takes advantage of this golden literary opportunity.

]]>