<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REVIEW: The Enchantress of Florence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chamberfour.com/2009/02/06/review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chamberfour.com/2009/02/06/review/</link>
	<description>for readers of books and ebooks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 00:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nico Vreeland</title>
		<link>http://chamberfour.com/2009/02/06/review/comment-page-1/#comment-3209</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico Vreeland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chamberfour.com/?p=584#comment-3209</guid>
		<description>Hi Claire,

Glad you liked it. Try Ragtime for a story kind of in the same vein (though set in early 20th century America). Off the charts entertainment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Claire,</p>
<p>Glad you liked it. Try Ragtime for a story kind of in the same vein (though set in early 20th century America). Off the charts entertainment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>http://chamberfour.com/2009/02/06/review/comment-page-1/#comment-3208</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chamberfour.com/?p=584#comment-3208</guid>
		<description>&quot;It’s ultimately a simple story told complexly, and unsatisfying as a result.&quot; - wonderful summary of my feelings about the novel, thank you. Though I found the entertainment value so low that I dropped it less than a fourth of the way through. It&#039;s less a narrative than a self-indulgent series of language-rich portraits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s ultimately a simple story told complexly, and unsatisfying as a result.&#8221; &#8211; wonderful summary of my feelings about the novel, thank you. Though I found the entertainment value so low that I dropped it less than a fourth of the way through. It&#8217;s less a narrative than a self-indulgent series of language-rich portraits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

